Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different options available for teens in light to the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
Most of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, and this helps it be hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are because of smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to find the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers may be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have a lot of stories about the rise Vape Pen Battery of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the level of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other medical issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are several reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it is true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, some of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we need to do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not based in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing how much chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.